The Chance To Be Brave, The Courage To Dare

Looking for a boost of empowerment? Come to artist-activist  and Astraea Visual Arts Committee member, Linda Stein’s presentation: The Chance To Be Brave, The Courage To Dare at the Elizabeth A. Sackler Center.  Stein will be discussing her exhibition Women of Valor at the Flomenhaft Gallery in Chelsea, her book The Power to Protect, sexism in the art world, and gender issues from a global perspective.

The Brooklyn Museum of Art Elizabeth A. Sackler Center for Feminist Art &
Have Art: Will Travel! Inc. For Peace and Equality

Cordially invite you to
THE CHANCE TO BE BRAVE,
THE COURAGE TO DARE

A fast, furious and funny presentation
by artist-activist and Astraea Visual Arts Committee Member,
Linda Stein

Sunday, October 18, 2009
2:00 PM

Brooklyn Museum of Art
The Forum Lecture Hall, 4th floor
200 Eastern Parkway [map]
Brooklyn, NY

Limited Seating. To RSVP, please e-mail: Info@haveartwilltravel.org

Sponsors:

Astraea Foundation
The Feminist Art Project
Flomenhaft Gallery
Ms. Foundation
National Council for Research on Women
On The Issues Magazine
Third Wave Foundation
Voice Male: Changing Men for Changing Times
Women of Color Policy Network
Women’s Enews

 

Women’s Night at Leo Bar

Want to meet and rub elbows with 400+ women in one night?  Then on October 16th,  join Astraea, OP.LYNX and Q-Wave for cocktails, chatting and mingling for Women’s Night at Asia Society’s Leo Bar!  Enjoy the free exhibition tours, sip on cocktail specials and chat the night away at one of the most popular women’s event in NYC.  A record turnout of over 500 women joined us at the last mixer!

Hanging Fire at Asia Society
Faiza Butt, Get Out of My Dreams II, 2008

Friday, October 16, 2009
6:00 – 9:00 PM

Leo Bar at Asia Society
725 Park Avenue
(at 70th Street)
New York, NY

Leo Bar is a cash bar with no cover charge.

Exhibition Tours scheduled for 7:15 PM and 7:45 PM.

Currently on view:

Hanging Fire: Contemporary Art from Pakistan
September 10, 2009–January 3, 2010

Devotion in South India: Chola Bromzes
October 6, 2009–February 8, 2010

Yoshihiro Suda: In Focus
October 6, 2009–February 8, 2010BD

 

Partnering Organizations:
Astraea Foundation
OP.LYNX
Q-Wave

Uganda: ‘Anti-Homosexuality’ Bill Threatens Liberties and Human Rights Defenders Proposed Provisions Illegal, Ominous, and Unnecessary

The draft “Anti-Homosexuality Bill” introduced on October 14, 2009 in Uganda’’s parliament would violate human rights and should be withdrawn immediately, a group of 16 local and international human rights organizations said today.

““This bill is a blow to the progress of democracy in Uganda,”” said David Kato of Sexual Minorities Uganda. “”It goes against the inclusive spirit necessary for our economic as well as political development. Its spirit is profoundly undemocratic and un-African.””

In an attack on the freedom of expression, a new, wide-ranging provision would forbid the “promotion of homosexuality” – including publishing information or providing funds, premises for activities, or other resources. Conviction could result in up to seven years in prison.

““This draft bill is clearly an attempt to divide and weaken civil society by striking at one of its most marginalized groups”,” said Scott Long, director of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Rights Program at Human Rights Watch. “The government may be starting here, but who will be next?”

The bill would criminalize the legitimate work of national and international activists and organizations working for the defense and promotion of human rights in Uganda. It would also put major barriers in the path of effective HIV/AIDS prevention efforts, the groups said.

“Discrimination and punitive laws like this aimed at marginalized groups and at those often among the most affected by HIV drives people underground and does nothing to help slow down the AIDS epidemic,” said Daniel Molokele, Africa program officer at the World AIDS Campaign.

Under Uganda’’s existing laws, the police arbitrarily arrest and detain men and women accused of engaging in consensual sex with someone of the same sex. Human rights organizations have documented cases of torture or other ill-treatment against lesbians and gay men in detention because of their sexual orientation.

““Certain provisions in this bill are illegal; they are also immoral,”” said Kate Sheill, Amnesty International’s expert on sexual rights. “”They criminalize a sector of society for being who they are, when what the government should be doing instead is protecting them from discrimination and abuse.””

Over recent months, there has been increased campaigning against homosexuality in Uganda, led by churches and anti-gay groups. The media have joined this campaign, and have publicly pointed to individuals they accuse of being gay or lesbian.

People suspected of being gay have faced death threats and been physically assaulted. Many have been ostracized by their families or faced discrimination, including dismissal from their place of employment.

This new draft bill includes a provision that could lead to the imprisonment for up to three years of anyone, including heterosexual people, who fails to report within 24 hours the identities of everyone they know who is lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender, or who supports human rights for people who are.

““This inflammatory bill will be taken as further confirmation that it is OK to attack or even kill people perceived to be lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender,”” said Victor Mukasa, of the International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission. ““It is the government’s responsibility to immediately withdraw this dangerous proposal.””

Background

  • The existing law, Section 140 of the Ugandan penal code, penalizes “carnal knowledge of any person against the order of nature” with imprisonment of up to 14 years. This legacy of British colonialism was introduced to punish local practices of what the colonial powers deemed to be “unnatural sex.” The laws stand as proof that same-sex sexual practices and gender diversity are, and always have been, part of Ugandan culture. The draft bill tabled today seeks to imprison anyone convicted of “the offense of homosexuality” for life.
  • Paragraph 3 of the draft bill sets out provisions on what it names as “aggravated homosexuality,” which will incur the death penalty, contradicting the global trend toward a moratorium on the use of the death penalty.
  • The final section of the bill provides for Uganda to nullify any of its international or regional commitments that it deems “contradictory to the spirit and provisions enshrined in this Act.” As both the African Commission and the UN Human Rights Committee have held, a state cannot, through its domestic law, negate its international human rights obligations.


Endorsed by:

Akina Mama wa Afrika (AMwA)
Amnesty International
ARC International
Article 19
Center for Women’s Global Leadership
COC Netherlands
Committee for the International Day against Homophobia and Transphobia
Egale Canada
Human Rights Watch
International Commission of Jurists
International Foundation for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders (Front Line)
International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission (IGLHRC)
Swedish Federation for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Rights (RFSL)
Uganda Feminist Forum (UFF)
Unitarian Universalist Church, United Nations Office
The World AIDS Campaign

Lora Jo Foo’s Earth Passages Reading

Join us on Thursday, October 8 as we celebrate photographer, writer and activist Lora Jo Foo’s new book, Earth Passages. Consisting of 28 vignettes and 53 color nature photographs, Earth Passages tells the story of the author growing up in the inner city ghetto of San Francisco’s Chinatown – in poverty, in a housing project, at the age of 11 sewing in a garment sweatshop. In the girl’s rare escapes into the woods she discovers a magical world so unlike the ghetto in which she lives. The stories from childhood are paired with color nature photographs taken by the author as an adult.

Hanging Fire at Asia Society

Thursday, October 8, 2009
6:00 PM

Home of Ann Hess & Craig Kaplan
New York City
(Lower Manhattan)

For details, please RSVP at: events@astraeafoundation.org or call: (212) 529-8021 x14

 

Sponsors:
Astraea Foundation
Ms. Foundation
National Asian Pacific American Women’s Forum
Women’s Environment & Development Organization

Astraea Honors Colleagues

Astraea honors the committed work and invaluable contributions of our colleagues Alex and Beverly, as both transition from Astraea staff to Astraea friends and ardent supporters.

Beverly and Alex

Over the last three years as Philanthropic Partnership Officer, Alex has expanded and deepened relationships with individual donors and made lasting contributions to our mission.  She been a tremendous value to Astraea and we will miss her frank and gentle honesty. Beverly has, in just a year as Director of Development, helped to increase institutional support, coalesced staff and has been instrumental in laying the groundwork for the year ahead.

As Alex and Beverly embark in exciting new directions, both will stay connected to Astraea.   Beverly said, “”Working for Astraea has been a way to live with passion and purpose.  It is a life-long commitment.””  Alex said, “”Astraea is an expression of my deepest personal political commitments, and I’m’ eager to enter a new phase of collaboration.””

If you’’d like to join the Astraea team and build on the work of these women, please apply.

Astraea Grantee Partners Speak Out about Sex-Test Controversy

Astraea grantee partners including Lesbian & Gay Equality Project, Engender and Intersex South Africa added their support to a joint press statement decrying the controversy surrounding Caster Semenya’s gold-medal win.

Caster Semenya and Gender Discrimination:

the ‘Elephant in the Room’

As seen on sangpulse.net

Caster Semenya: National Heroine

“Caster should not be having to deal with a world controversy over her win. She should be unreservedly basking in the glory of her and our incredible victory. No doubt she has experienced this humiliation and discrimination at other levels before and has become somewhat hardened to its effect, but we wish her, her friends and her family strength in dealing with this blatant gender discrimination. As Caster Semenya and our other gold medal winner, Mbulaeni Mulaudzi, return – congratulations on your amazing wins and Caster, you have our full support. For the rest, to Caster’s detractors or apologists, hang your heads in shame for not ‘naming’ the issue for what it is and for perpetuating gender stereotypes and discrimination in her individual case and in society as a whole.”

August 26, 2009—: We write in response to the controversy surrounding the 800m women’’s world running champion, Caster Semenya and the flurry of articles surrounding this sad saga.

Some of those championing Caster’s cause accuse those wanting to sex-test Caster of imperialism and racism (as well as sexism). Others plead for the us to wait before ‘reaching a verdict’ arguing that the realities of sex testing are enormously complex.

Firstly to address the issue of terminology, over which there seems to be confusion. Gender is the dominant society’s views on how women and men should look, behave, what roles they should play in society, how they should perform and frequently what rewards they receive – hence gender inequity. This has usually led to lower status and discrimination against girls/women but has increasingly been seen as limiting the options and potentially harming boys/men too. Gender is not a politically correct term for sex. Sex testing would be just that–establishing whether a person is biologically female or male. So gender testing is not the term that should be used this case, but sex testing.

Secondly, to tackle the science issue, as this tends to obscure the real issue of gender stereotyping and discrimination so evident in this case. Professor Tim Noakes, an international sports science expert says the issue of ‘unfair advantage’ which is the only thing that should be at play here as it is in the case of drug use,is simple to establish. He states that the issue that needs to be clarified here is whether the person concerned is a man masquerading as a woman or not. This could be established by a simple physical examination ‘handled within the usual constraints of the doctor/patient domain–not in the public domain” (Cape Argus, ‘Why the world should leave Caster alone’ Fri Aug 21, 2009:21), as has happened in the harmful manner in which the IAAF has handled this.

As for the rest, he says there is great variation. All other possible tests including chromosome testing are indeterminate and should be left well alone. The calls for more to be done in dealing with this issue and await judgment are therefore erroneous and cloud the issue in a shroud of inappropriate so-called scientific enquiry.

The third issue relates to what lies at the heart of the matter, social norms. While issues of racism and imperialism have and will continue to apply in various circumstances and have a sensitive history in terms of women’s bodies particular in Africa, focusing on these issues in the current context obscures the much neglected ‘elephant in the room’ – gender discrimination. Comments within the press and on talk shows are unwittingly guilty of this same problem in placing ‘blame’ at Athletics South Africa or her coach’s door. (article in sportsscientists.com and editorial in Mail and Guardian ‘Racing to conclusions’, August 21-27 2009:20). They argue that the authorities should have pre-empted this situation, given her prior experiences (at the hands of the teachers, members of the public and previous authorities). ‘Pre-empting the situation’ would fall prey to the exactly these same prejudices – pandering to what people perceive to be ‘normal’ for girls or women. This is akin to what might have happened during the apartheid era where actions may have tried to stave off racism by negotiating black people’s entry into racially reserved sporting or cultural events before the time. Many white girls who do not ‘look’ as society expects will tell similar humiliating stories of being stopped from entering female public toilets or being questioned as to whether they are male or female. At the core of this issue are ideas about gender – how girls/women and boys/men ‘look’ and ‘behave’ and perform (in this case perhaps a young woman winning by 2 seconds ahead of the field is not seen as ‘normal’).

This is what has been so hard to address locally in South Africa, despite our progressive constitution, due to deeply held dominant ideas about what is ‘female’ and ‘male’. It is these ideas and actions that promote gender discrimination. This leads to men, who in societies’ terms do not look ‘masculine enough’, being called ‘sissies’ and women who look not ‘feminine enough’ being labelled ‘butch’. In our own society, this has led to violent attacks on some women and in our own and other countries to violent attacks on some boys/men. This is what we need to clearly point to as underlying this case and name it for what it is. Framing the discrimination as racism or imperialism, without reference to gender discrimination as the main issue risks reinforcing gender stereotypes.

Societies have a long way to go in terms of changing the dominant ideas on how women and men should ‘look’ and behave and perform and in some cases, dress – and allow for variations in ‘looks’ and roles to be underpinned by what people would like to be and do, rather than societies’ current dominant expectations. There are many excellent organisations in our own country and abroad that have worked with women and men on this issues, but as it is all to obvious from this and other cases, much work is still needed for these choices and this freedom to take root in the broader society as a whole.

Caster should not be having to deal with a world controversy over her win. She should be unreservedly basking in the glory of her and our incredible victory. No doubt she has experienced this humiliation and discrimination at other levels before and has become somewhat hardened to its effect, but we wish her, her friends and her family strength in dealing with this blatant gender discrimination. As Caster Semenya and our other gold medal winner, Mbulaeni Mulaudzi, return – congratulations on your amazing wins and Caster, you have our full support. For the rest, to Caster’s detractors or apologists, hang your heads in shame for not ‘naming’ the issue for what it is and for perpetuating gender stereotypes and discrimination in her individual case and in society as a whole.

As we once again approach the 16 days of activism against violence against women, let us bear these issues in mind and not mouth platitudes in our struggle against gender inequity and discrimination.

Yours Sincerely,

Diane Cooper – Director, Women’s Health Research Unit, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town

Leslie London, Director, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town

Elinor Sisulu, South Africa

Prudence Mabele, Positive Women’s Network, South Africa

Nomfundo Eland , Treatment Action Campaign (TAC) Women’s Rights Campaign

Glenn de Swardt, Health4Men

Lisa Vetten, Tshwaranang Legal Advocacy Centre to End Violence Against Women

Gertrude Fester, Feminist Forum/ Women’s and Gender Studies,University of Western Cape

Naeemah Abrahams, Gender and Health Research Unit, Medical Research Council, South Africa

Pamela Scully, Women’s Studies and African Studies, Emory University & Deputy Editor, Women’s History Review

Sipho Mthathi, Human Rights Watch South Africa

Carrie Shelver, People Opposing Women Abuse, South Africa

Deborah Byrne, Foundation for Human Rights (FHR)
Akosua Adomako Ampofo, University of Ghana

Lebohang Letsie, University of Botswana

Amina Mama, Barbara Lee Distinguished Chair, Mills College, USA Jane Harries, Associate Director, Women’s Health Research Unit, University of Cape Town

Jennifer Moodley, Women’s Health Research Unit, University of Cape Town

Lillian Artz, Director, Gender, Health and Justice Unit, University of Cape Town

Liesl Theron, Gender Dynamix

Dipika Nath, Human Rights Watch

Sheila Meintjes, Political Studies Department, Wits University

Ilse Ahrends, the Saartjie Baartman Centre for Women and Children

Phumi Mtetwa,the Lesbian and Gay Equality Project
Marion Stevens, Health Systems Trust

Angelica Pino, Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation

Shireen Hassim, University of Witwatersrand, South Africa

Phyllis Orner, Women’s Health Research Unit, University of Cape Town

Sumaya Mall, Women’s Health Research Unit, University of Cape Town

Ntobeko Nywagi, Women’s Health Research Unit, University of Cape Town

Sheila Cishe, Women’s Health Research Unit, University of Cape Town

Chelsea Morroni, Women’s Health Research Unit, University of Cape Town

Regina Mlobeli, Women’s Health Research Unit, University of Cape Town

Jane Bennett, African Gender Institute, University of Cape Town

Mary Jansen (KIWIA) Khoe San Indigenous Women in Action
Shirley Walters, University of Western Cape, South Africa

Linda Cooper, Centre for Higher Education and Development, University of Cape Town

Cathy Mathews, Medical Research Council

Fareeda Jadwat,African Gender Institute, University of Cape Town

Ilse Ahrends, Saartjie Baartman Centre for Women and Children, South Africa

Di McIntyre, NRF chair, Health Economics Unit, University of Cape Town

Andrea Rother, Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health Research, UCT

Nomfundo Mlisa: President – Gender Forum: University of Fort Hare, Alice

Masiphile Community Project: Tsengiwe Village, Cala

Johanna Kehler, Director, AIDS Legal Network, South Africa

Ayanda Rapita, the Lesbian and Gay Equality Project
Melissa Steyn, Department of Sociology, University of Cape Town, South Africa

Gabi Jiyane,the Lesbian and Gay Equality Project

Marion Heap, Health and Human Rights, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, UCT

Balise Mahlanguthe, Lesbian and Gay Equality Project

Bernadette Bredekamp, Division of Family Medicine, University of Cape Town

Larissa Klazinga and Rhodes Gender Action Project

Laura Pollecutt, South Africa

Sokari Ekine,London

Natasha Primo

Alex Kent

Annemarie Hendrikz

Jon Weinberg, Cape Town

Eva Hunt, South Africa

Shirley Gunn, Cape Town

Susan Holland-Muter, South Africa

Tara Weinberg, Cape Town

Lavona George, South Africa

Gille de Vlieg, South Africa

Michael Weinberg, Cape Town

Anne Schuster, South Africa

Jenny Radloff, South Africa

Kathy Watters, Cape Town

Sakina Mohamed, South Africa

Nicolene McLean, Gender Action Project

Carla Tsampiras, Rhodes History Dept

Corinne Knowles, GENACT

Alan Kirkaldy, NTESU

Carol Thomas, thewomanspace

Thava Govender, Human Development Consulting Agency,KZN, South Africa

Richard Matzopoulos, Medical Research Council and UCT Public Health

Bernedette Muthien, Engender

Sally Gross,Intersex South Africa

Surplus People Project, South Africa

Sharon Stanton, S.L Stanton Attorneys

Tessa Lewin, Institute of Development Studies, UK

Marjorie Jobson, Khulumani Support Group

Charlotte Young, South Africa

Melanie Judge, South Africa

Lin Helme, Adult Learning Forum, South Africa

Thembi Luckett, Faculty of Law, University of Cape Town

Mohamed Jeebhay, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town

Elaine Salo, Institute for Women’s and Gender Studies. Univ of Pretoria

Marinda Maree – Institute for Women’s and Gender Studies – Univ of Pretoria

Rory DuPlessis – Institute for Women’s and Gender Studies – Univ of Pretoria

Owen Sichone – Department of Anthropology & Archaeology – Univ of Pretoria

Kammila Naidoo – Department of Sociology- Univ of Pretoria

Sven Ouzman – Department of Anthropology & Archaeology – Univ. of Pretoria

Rehana Ebrahim-Vally – Department of Anthropology & Archaeology – Univ of Pretoria

Feminist Alternatives

Ingrid Meintjes, African Gender Institute & Perinatal Mental Health Project

Mary Hames – Gender Equity Unity, South Africa

Desiree Lewis

Vasu Reddy, Gender and Development Unit – HSRC

Sophie Oldfield

Lubna Nadvi, UKZN, Durban

Josette Cole, Mandlovu Development Trust, South Africa

Thava Govender, Human Development Consulting Agency,South Africa

Charlotte Young, South Africa

Ashnie Padarath, Health Systems Trust

Simone Honikman, Head, Perinatal Mental Health Project, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town

Cherryl Walker, Department Chair Sociology and Social Anthropology, Stellenbosch University

This work’s Creative Commons license

TIME Highlights Efforts of Grantee Partners and Allies in Asia

Astraea grantee partners around the world are charting the course for a global social-justice-feminist movement.  On nearly every continent, in myriad languages and cultures, they are collectively seizing opportunities and laying the groundwork for LGBTI people to live freely and safely.  Today’s TIME Magazine story investigates changing tides in Asia and highlights Sunil Pant, longtime grantee partner-turned-legislator in Kathmandu, Nepal.

With the Blue Diamond Society, Sunil has helped move the climate from violence towards acceptance for third-gender people in Nepal.  TIME also highlights victories and movements in India and those stirring in China, invigorated by the Astraea-funded leadership training camps for lalas (lesbian, bi, and transgender).

 

Why Asia’s Gays are Starting to Win Acceptance

By Jyoti Thottam for Time Magazine

Sunil Babu Pant is a schoolteacher’s son who grew up in the rough green mountains of central Nepal. The youngest of six children, indulged by his family, Pant remembers feeling attracted to other boys. But he wore that knowledge lightly, with the innocence of a sheltered child. Boys and girls played separately; Pant thought that his friends must feel just as he did. “It didn’t appear as a problem to me growing up in the countryside,” he says. “Even though I knew about myself, I couldn’t define it.”

By 28, Pant had a word for what he felt, and in 2000 he moved to Kathmandu, Nepal’s capital, to find other gay people and some sense of belonging. What he discovered horrified him. After dark, a small underground subculture of gay men and women would meet each other in a few of the city’s parks and ancient courtyards, gatherings that took place under a constant threat of violence by the police. A law against “unnatural sexual conduct” was often used as a pretext for harassment, he says. “It was such an unseen, unspoken tragedy that was going on every day.”

Pant could have chosen to live as other gays do in Asia’s conservative societies, hiding his sexuality behind a sham marriage while leading a dangerous double life. Instead, he decided to come out and to work against discrimination. “There was a choice to make,” he says, “whether you feel threatened and live your life with misery, or you live with courage.” In 2001, Pant and a few friends organized the Blue Diamond Society — named after the Diamond Sutra, a well-known translation of Buddhist teachings emphasizing compassion — to distribute information about HIV. The group later began documenting human-rights abuses against gay people, and its members sued to overturn Nepal’s law criminalizing homosexuality. In December 2007, Nepal’s Supreme Court ruled in their favor. Four months later, Pant, who was the main petitioner in the case, became South Asia’s first openly gay member of parliament. By the end of 2008, the Supreme Court issued its full judgment, which not only nullified the old law but also established a “third gender” category for government documents. A newly formed government advisory committee is studying the possibility of legalizing gay marriage. In less than a decade, Nepal, a poor and devout Hindu kingdom, had become what the Indian writer and gay activist C.K. Meena calls “a gaytopia.”

Read the entire article

Summer eThreads!

Read inspiring stories featuring Astraea’’s strategic work and our incredible community of grantees from cultural workers to policy wonks.

Don’t miss eThreads, Summer 2009 edition. Read inspiring stories featuring Astraea’’s strategic work and our incredible community of grantees from cultural workers to policy wonks. Watch these stories come to life through photo galleries and even a short film. Connecting communities is at the core of our work, and we hope that eThreads will strengthen, even further, our connection with you.

Visit eThreads.org

Astraea Receives 10K Social Media Grant

Astraea is pleased to announce our receipt of a $10,000 Social Media Grant from Fenton Communications.  Astraea, Let’s Get Ready and the Volunteer Consulting Group were selected from a pool of 240 applicants.  Dean Hollander, Senior Vice President and head of Fenton’s interactive and new media services said, “We chose our three grantees because we believe each of them demonstrated a commitment to using social media and a willingness to innovate.”

FENTON AWARDS $30,000 IN FIRST-EVER SOCIAL MEDIA GRANTS
The Astraea Lesbian Foundation for Justice, Let’s Get Ready and Volunteer Consulting Group Selected

Grants Draw Response from More than 240 Nonprofits Seeking to Raise Their Web 2.0 Profile in Tough Fiscal Times

NEW YORK – July 9, 2009: An organization that serves low-income high school students, a nonprofit that helps other nonprofits find board members, and the only foundation in the world solely dedicated to funding LGBTI organizations are the three recipients of Fenton Communications’ free Social Media Grants to New York City-based nonprofits.

Fenton first announced the grant offering, which comes with $10,000 in social media strategy and related services, in late May and received more than 240 applicants.

“The enormous response these grants received shows how willing nonprofits are to experiment and innovate – especially in a recession,” said Lisa Witter, Chief Operating Officer of Fenton, the country’s largest integrated public interest communications firm. “Nonprofits recognize that social media can be a powerful and nimble tool for growing membership, raising money, and ultimately, making change. These grants are designed to help them make the most strategic use of this explosive technology for good.”

In these challenging economic times, many organizations lack the resources to explore the exciting opportunities of social media tools like Twitter and Facebook. Fenton offered these grants to help organizations harness the power of social media for social change.

About the recipients:

Let’’s Get Ready (LGR): Let’s Get Ready provides low-income and under-represented high school students with the support they need to successfully complete the college admissions process. Using volunteer college students who act as tutors, mentors and role models, LGR provides its students with intensive SAT tutoring and critical assistance through the college application process. Fenton will help LGR raise the profile of the organization among potential participants, volunteers, and funders by building and strengthening online and offline networks.

Astraea Lesbian Foundation for Justice (ALFJ): The Astraea Lesbian Foundation for Justice is the only foundation in the world solely dedicated to funding LGBTI organizations both in the US and internationally. Their grantmaking and philanthropic advocacy programs help lesbians and allied communities work around the world to achieve racial, economic, gender, and social justice. Fenton will help Astraea develop a long-term engagement and fundraising strategy that starts with converting current offline membership to online and then leveraging those relationships to expand the profile of Astraea within the philanthropic and donor community.

Volunteer Consulting Group, Inc. (VCG): Volunteer Consulting Group, Inc. works regionally and nationally to strengthen the governing and management capability of nonprofit boards of directors. Fenton will help VCG clarify brand promise and use new media to help recruit and connect new leaders, trustees, funders, and board members.

Each grant recipient will receive a social media audit and strategic recommendations including:

Social Media Analysis–A review of how their organization and/or issue area is being talked about online, what topics and/or frames are driving the most conversation, and where the conversation around an organization’’s issue is most prevalent.

Campaign Development–A specific campaign concept(s) designed to drive conversation and social media engagement through Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, and other social networks.

Engagement Strategy–A plan of action to drive social media participation through email outreach, Search engine optimization, online advertising, Facebook, Twitter, blogger relations, and video distribution.

An overview to Fenton’s approach to Social Media Campaign Strategy can be found in our newest guide: WATTA? What Are They Talking About: Social Media, Web 2.0, and Your Online Engagement Strategy.

“Many nonprofits are testing the waters by putting up a Facebook page or Twittering.  But these applications have much more potential as research tools that can provide critical insights as to how organizations are most likely to engage people around their issues, where they are talking about their issue, and what outreach tactics should be integrated into a social media campaign strategy. We chose our three grantees because we believe each of them demonstrated a commitment to using social media and a willingness to innovate,” said Dean Hollander, Senior Vice President and head of Fenton’s interactive and new media services.

Due to the high demand, Fenton plans to announce new scalable social media service offerings for nonprofits and will release a report on how New York City area nonprofits are investing and using social media later this summer.

About Fenton Communications – With more than two decades of serving the public interest, Fenton offers integrated communications services to nonprofits, foundations, educational institutions, and socially responsible businesses. In partnership with our clients, we protect the environment, transform markets, improve public health, and advance human rights and social justice. http://fenton.com

Delhi High Court Overturns ‘Sodomy’ Law

Astraea celebrates the Delhi High Court ruling overturning the ‘Sodomy’ Law.  The Court ruled that Penal Code Section 377, enacted during British Colonial Rule, was unconstitutional and violated international human rights conventions.  We applaud our grantee partners and the myriad and creative ways they work to advance justice for LGBTI people in India.

New York Times: Indian Court Overturns Gay Sex Ban

Read International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission’s action alert in support of the court decision.

Human Rights Watch’s In Depth Report
India: Court Strikes Down ‘Sodomy’ Law
Government Should Uphold Decision of Delhi High Court

The ruling today by the Delhi High Court that Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) can no longer be used to treat consensual homosexual conduct between adults as a criminal offense is a victory for basic rights to privacy, non-discrimination, and liberty, Human Rights Watch said today.

The ruling of the two-judge bench of the Delhi High Court, consisting of Chief Justice A.P. Shah and Justice S. Muralidhar, means that Section 377, which criminalizes “carnal intercourse against the order of nature,” will no longer apply to consensual sexual activity among adults. This is the first time that a senior court in India has issued a decision on the law. While the ruling applies to New Delhi, it is likely to influence the legal establishment across the nation.

“This legal remnant of British colonialism has been used to deprive people of their basic rights for too long,” said Scott Long, director of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) Rights Program at Human Rights Watch. “This long-awaited decision testifies to the reach of democracy and rights in India.”

Human Rights Watch urged India’s government not to contest or appeal the decision. Human Rights Watch also urged India’s Lok Sabha (Parliament) to move quickly to scrap Section 377 nationwide, and to replace it with laws that would provide full, gender-neutral protection for children and adults against sexual abuse and assault. Existing Indian “rape laws” do not recognize anything but penile-vaginal penetration as sexual assault, which leaves many adults and children, including male children, unprotected.

The case has been before the Delhi High Court since 2001. Hearings began in May 2008, and the bench has been deliberating its judgment since November 2008. The petitioners, Naz Foundation (India) Trust, were represented by Anand Grover of Lawyers Collective (who was appointed UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Health in July 2008). The petitioners argued that Section 377 violated not only tenets of the Indian constitution, but also international human rights standards. They drew special attention to the fact that the law did not distinguish between consensual and non-consensual sexual acts. They also argued that the law impedes HIV and AIDS prevention and outreach by driving underground already vulnerable populations, such as men who have sex with men.

India’s Ministry of Home Affairs opposed changes to the law on the grounds that decriminalizing homosexual conduct would “open the floodgates of delinquent behavior.” However, the affidavit filed by the National AIDS Control Association of India – part of the Ministry of Health – took a contrary stand, supporting the petitioners’ statements about the need for decriminalization in the fight against HIV and AIDS. More recently, Union Health Minister Anbumani Ramadoss supported decriminalization for similar reasons.

Voices against 377, a coalition of women’s rights, children’s rights, LGBT rights, and human rights groups in India, intervened in support of the petitioners. It pointed to cases of arrest, abuse, and harassment of LGBT people to support the argument that Section 377 violated the fundamental rights of a vulnerable community.

As Human Rights Watch documented in a 2008 report, “This Alien Legacy: The Origins of ‘Sodomy’ Laws in British Colonialism,” British colonizers introduced Section 377 to India in 1860. It became a model for similar sodomy laws imposed on other British colonies, and comparable provisions survive today from Singapore to Uganda.

“Most of the world’s sodomy laws are relics of colonialism,” said Long. “As the world’s largest democracy, India has shown the way for other countries to rid themselves of these repressive burdens.”

Colonies and countries that retain versions of this British sodomy law include:
• In Asia and the Pacific: Bangladesh, Bhutan, Brunei, India, Kiribati, Malaysia, Maldives, Marshall Islands, Myanmar (Burma), Nauru, Pakistan, Papua New Guinea, Singapore, Solomon Islands, Sri Lanka, Tonga, Tuvalu, and Western Samoa. (Governments that inherited the same British law, but have abolished it since include Australia, Fiji, Hong Kong, and New Zealand.)
• In Africa: Botswana, Gambia, Ghana, Kenya, Lesotho, Malawi, Mauritius, Nigeria, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Swaziland, Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia, and Zimbabwe.

Eleven former British colonies in the Caribbean also retain sodomy laws derived from a different British model than the one imposed on India.